permalink for this thread : http://search.catflaporama.com/post/browse/529540614
fastcakes Posted on 11/4 15:57
Smoking ban question

It just occured to me of possible loopholes in the smoking ban coming up soon.

I am guessing that there will be an exemption for film sets, that is, where there is a film (tv, etc) being made, and the characters are smoking.
What is to stop a pub from setting up a video camera and letting people smoke, and if challenged they can claim to be making a drama set in a pub where the characters are smoking.

I know it sounds silly, and I am in favour of the ban myself, but I wonder if the legislation covers this scenario.

Pauluka Posted on 11/4 15:58
re: Smoking ban question

Interesting

Turner_86 Posted on 11/4 15:59
re: Smoking ban question


zoec Posted on 11/4 15:59
re: Smoking ban question

That's not really a serious question, is it?

Pauluka Posted on 11/4 16:00
re: Smoking ban question

Wasn't it? Damn, best use my get out of jail card........


Sorted

jordan_boro_2k6 Posted on 11/4 16:00
re: Smoking ban question

I think a few pubs and clubs may sell up due to the ban

davyboy2004 Posted on 11/4 16:01
re: Smoking ban question

NO. As a film set is a place of work the ban will need to be in place by July 1st....

Elron_Hubbard Posted on 11/4 16:02
re: Smoking ban question

that loophole is covered.

you can smoke during plays/ filiming, etc if you are doing so for reasons of artistic integrity. putting a camera in a pub won't count.

captain5 Posted on 11/4 16:03
re: Smoking ban question

You could also have the 'actors' carrying guns, selling drugs etc.

Sounds good.

Which pub??

fastcakes Posted on 11/4 16:15
re: Smoking ban question

But who is to decide which filming is artictic and which isn't?

'm probably answering my own question here, but I guess that would be da judge.

foggonsfplandiet Posted on 11/4 17:46
re: Smoking ban question

Elron; I don't doubt you mate but this lighting up for artistic integrity pees me off. In what circumstances would a film or play really justify having a character smoke? How could it be essential to the story?

Piquet2 Posted on 11/4 17:47
re: Smoking ban question

They will use CG smoke

borobadge Posted on 11/4 17:52
re: Smoking ban question

elron is right in this instance....

unless you can show prior to the theatre / film performance that the cigar/ cigarette is artistically pivotal to the scene / show /performance then you cant smoke in the enclosed space...

much easier to get round it in film making, you just go outside/balcont/garden etc...difficult in a enclosed theatre.

well you can, but you leave yourself open to a fine and prosicution..but as they say , 'theres no such thing as bad publicity'

OooOo Posted on 11/4 18:51
re: Smoking ban question

Didnt Mel Smith get into trouble for smoking a cigar playing Churchhill? I would have thought that was artistically ok

Long_Live_Zombies Posted on 11/4 19:35
re: Smoking ban question

Can't wait for any excuses - the most longest are the best. The best non - smoker is an ex one!

--- Post edited by Long_Live_Zombies on 11/4 19:35 ---

Elron_Hubbard Posted on 12/4 10:32
re: Smoking ban question

OooOo is right with his example - Mel Smith was playing Churchill at the Edinburgh festival and was not allowed to smoke a cigar. In England there is an exemption for such artic=stic licence.

Maybe smokers could pretend they are method actors playing the part of feckless, selfish, inconsiderate, filthy stinkards whose day has passed.

mto1986 Posted on 12/4 22:58
re: Smoking ban question

I would like to know why WE (the English) have to wait until July.

onthemap Posted on 12/4 23:02
re: Smoking ban question

Beer gardens are gonna be fun places this summer.

Towell Posted on 12/4 23:19
re: Smoking ban question

So if i light up a tab in a pub and claim it's to maintain my "artistic integrity" i'll be alright?