permalink for this thread : http://search.catflaporama.com/post/browse/1932057
HolgateCorner Posted on 08/06/2010 23:00
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

just for argument, that's 25 per week in either pay cuts, tax rises, benefits cuts etc, assuming you keep your job.

What would you do without?

My first cut would be get rid of Murdoch Sports and cheapen down the rest of my TV/Broadband/phone package.

I'd like to see the likes of Murdoch suffer in this age of austerity.


TheBoy007 Posted on 08/06/2010 23:03
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

Oh god yeah. I'd love to see Sky go to the wall, unfortunatly there's as much chance as that happening as a rich man getting into heaven.

Smoggy_in_Wilts Posted on 08/06/2010 23:11
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

I would do without food, mmmm could be a good thing [^][^][^]

HolgateCorner Posted on 08/06/2010 23:12
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

yes, 10 a week off the food bill would do me no harm either...[^]

blindschool Posted on 08/06/2010 23:22
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

If there's one thing certain, Murdoch, the city bankers and the rich will not suffer in the next few years. We are the mugs who will pay the price for the failure of capitalism.

HolgateCorner Posted on 08/06/2010 23:24
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

but imagine how you will look after you've lost a couple of stones - you'll have to fight the women off...

Every cloud..

jam69 Posted on 08/06/2010 23:31
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

how about not contributing to overpaid average footballers retirement funds?

HolgateCorner Posted on 08/06/2010 23:37
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

jam 69 - must admit that one does come strong on the radar.

borobadge Posted on 08/06/2010 23:51
If the government 'cuts' cost you 100 per month net..

S'POSE ITS 200 A MONTH....then what ?